California internet dating safety act

It was also pushed by the tech industry and other experts that language in the proposed CDA making providers responsible for indecent content posted by users that could extend to other types of questionable free speech. Section 230(c)(1) provides immunity from liability for providers and users of an "interactive computer service" who publish information provided by third-party users: Section 230 was developed in response to a pair of lawsuits against Internet service providers in the early 1990s that had different interpretations of whether the services providers should be treated as publishers or distributors of content created by its users.The degree of punishment varies according to the age of the perpetrator and the age of the minor.Any adult who engages in sex with minors more than three years younger is guilty of either a misdemeanor or a felony punishable by imprisonment in a county jail or or state prison for not more than one year.American Civil Liberties Union (1997) to be partially unconstitutional, leaving the Section 230 provisions in place.Since then, several legal challenges have validated the constitutionality of Section 230.California law on underage dating applies to sexual conduct with minors.According to California law, an unlawful act of sexual intercourse occurs when an adult (18 years or older) has sex with a minor (under 18) who is not the spouse of the perpetrator.

Violators can also be subject to civil penalties depending on the age of the participants.

This concern was raised by legal challenges against Compu Serve and Prodigy, early service providers at this time. Service providers made their Congresspersons aware of these cases, believing that if upheld across the nation, it would stifle the growth of the Internet.

Compu Serve stated they would not attempt to regulate what users posted on their services, while Prodigy had employed a team of moderators to validate content. Compu Serve Inc., Compu Serve was found not be at fault as, by its stance as allowing all content to go unmoderated, it was a distributor and thus not liable for libelous content posted by users. United States Representative Christopher Cox (R-CA) had read an article about the two cases and felt the decisions were backwards.

Section 230 protects are not limitless, requiring providers to remove criminal material such as copyright infringement; more recently, Section 230 was amended by the Stop Enabling Sex Traffickers Act in 2018 to require the removal of material violating federal and state sex trafficking laws.

Passed at a time where Internet use was just starting to take off, Section 230 has frequently been referred as a key law that has allowed the Internet to flourish, often referred to as "The Twenty-Six Words That Created the Internet".

Leave a Reply